|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Jonathan Beverly
( From the RRCA website www.rrca.org) One of the most comforting books ever written on running," writes Joe Henderson in Better Runs, "contains mostly numbers." The book, Age-Graded Tables, provides precise data on how to rate one's athletic performance at any age. This seemingly benign document can create considerable emotion -- a comfort to many aging runners, a cause for some, and, for a few, a contention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First compiled by the World Association of Veteran's Athletes (WAVA) in 1989, Age-Graded Tables underwent a thorough updating in 1994. The current tables are "pretty solid," says Al Sheahen, editor of National Masters News and chair of the WAVA age-graded subcommittee. "They're backed by 30 years of experience and thousands of actual results." The finished product describes the upper limits of performance at every age and distance. Given this
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
upper limit, the tables enable a runner to compute two new descriptions of a running performance (for specifics, see the sidebar "Do the math" below): Age-adjusted time. Multiplied by a runner's actual time, an "age factor" adjusts the time to what it would have been in their prime. Performance-level percentage (PLP). Dividing one's time by the "age standard" provides a percentage value that can be compared to any (Continued on page 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|